City's artificial commercials are amazing. Arsenal's are...erm...

Sack the 22% division.
Isn't that Egghead's job?

They made more than ManU too...

Guessing matchday income includes prizemoney?

lagos wrote:

city's broadcast revenues looks iffy.

Ducked out of champs league early..?

In saying that Liverpool were still higher.

Looking at 2012, City's broadcast rev was c.70m, so they've changed something.

lagos wrote:

"Arsenal remain the only club in
the top 20 for whom matchday revenue is their largest
revenue source."

That's not what the chart says. Have they fucked up the legend or am I being ridiculously stupid?

Aye, the legend is back to front. Dark green is broadcast.

The numbers tally with last years figures if you switch those two areas.

Captain wrote:

Aye, the legend is back to front. Dark green is broadcast.

Makes a lot more sense. Barca and Real generally earn around 70 million more than any English club in broadcasts thanks to the individual television deals.

Didn't realise Dortmund had an 80 000-seater stadium. Impressive.

Oh, I see.

Come to think of it, I remember reading about Dortmund standing areas not too long ago.

Actually, I've got my numbers all wrong. They have a standing section for 25k giving the overall capacity of 80, but that drops to 65k on international nights when it is all seater.

So, still a massive stadium.

From the Swiss Ramble's twitter feed.

Our commercial earnings are quite poor really in comparison to others mainly down to our kit and shirt sponsor. Forget about foreign club for a moment because their deals won't apply to English clubs but look at us in comparison to English clubs. We have a £65mill income from commercial deals, Spurs have a commercial income of £51mill, Liverpool have £99mill, Chelsea have £87mill, Man City £139mill & Man Utd £165mill. If the Shirt and kit deal brings us in an extra £40mill that gets us over £100mill but still a lot more potential growth there. I think this commercial revenue is why Stan won't look to sell the club just yet (if his plan is to sell that is) and why Usmanov wants it now. Man City in effect pretty much sponsor themselves from what I recall so those figures are bound to look a bit suspicious! The funny thing is unless we improve and get more successful we can't command better commercial deals but without those the club will argue we can't compete :confused:

Our match day income looks fine, we probably haven't played as many home games as we didn't get that far in most cup competitions otherwise we would of been higher.

TV revenue again looks about right, we don't have individual deals like the Spanish do and I think from next season that should rise by quite a bit. Again as we didn't get far TV revenue not as high as it could be.

Commercials went up 15m euros on last year, if anybody is interested.