I love it when sports journos don't even bother quoting sources that don't want to be named.

Where would he play if we signed him?

I like him and think he's a good player but he's not half as good in the spare midfield role we have as he is in the number 10 slot.

The rod is back. eh?

In rod we trust.

Our goalkeepers are not good enough to be compared to the rod!

Not unless we get him in as player manager, it's that or nothing.

Fellaini is obviously a decent player, but the question we have to ask ourselves is if we really need a player whose name sounds dangerously similar to fellatio.

sounds nothing like fellatio. sicko

---- Wilshere ---- Arteta -----
Cazorla --- Fellaini --- Podolski
----------- Giroud ------------

That feels a bit more dangerous for me. Fellaini gives us power in midfield. Can drop back to help wilshere and Arteta or go forward to be an additional striker with Giroud. Also gives us setpiece height. Finally, would allow us to reduce dependency on Cazorla.

We aren't signing Fellaini. His value will never be higher, he'll be well outside of the price-range it's worth paying for him now.

I would play Fellaini in Diaby's position.

What do you do with Cazorla and Wilshere?
Or do you drop one of Wilshere/Arteta and play Walcott in your preferred matchday squad?

Dunno and not too bothered, they play elsewhere or sit on the bench.

If we are signing an Everton player I prefer Mirallas

Don't want Fellatio.

Rex, you're the first man to express this sentiment

The player! The player! I want to really stress that!

I understood Rex. You're married and women are evil...