No one in their right mind would want Spurs in Champions League.

Since it's a straight choice between two varieties of schadenfreude, definitely Spurs. Spurs being in the CL means fuck all since they'll never get anywhere in the comp, but Chelsea being out of it entire would be pretty juicy.

No one in their right mind would want Chelsea winning the Champions league.

Plus I think Spurs will lose their best players over the summer and they'll never trust 'arry again. Win.

Spurs will fall apart if they don't qualify for Champions League. This is literally the most important game for them in a decade or more.

Nah they wont they will keep on spending, chelsea on the other hand if they lose can see them only going downwards. spuds will if lucky qualify but wont ever get anywhere near the quarter final let alone final.

Spurs qualifying for the Champions League means nothing in the overall scheme of things. They still finished below us and they still wont have the money to go and buy a team to challenge properly next year.

Defo want Chelsea to lose.

They can't keep spending. They have a wage bill that is way too big for a non-CL club already. Their best players will leave for certain if they fail to qualify. And it'll throw a spanner into their stadium development.

SamDaGooner wrote:

Nah they wont they will keep on spending, chelsea on the other hand if they lose can see them only going downwards. spuds will if lucky qualify but wont ever get anywhere near the quarter final let alone final.

Spurs will keep spending and Chelsea won't? You mad?

No, I can't tolerate the idea of Lampard, Terry, Drogba and Cole picking up a CL trophy. Really can't.

Even if it means Spurs being 'our rivals' for a bit longer.

This really is the last gasp for those horrible horrible bastards at Chelsea. Too old after this. May they lose and may they rot.

Shame Newcastle lost

For all Newcastle's promise, they've barely managed a result against the teams above and around them.

The idea of Abramovich lifting the CL trophy next week is very, very troubling....
Rather the Spurs qualify then Chelsea lift the trophy....Ugh! Makes me sick thinking about it.

Captain wrote:

SamDaGooner wrote:

Nah they wont they will keep on spending, chelsea on the other hand if they lose can see them only going downwards. spuds will if lucky qualify but wont ever get anywhere near the quarter final let alone final.

Spurs will keep spending and Chelsea won't? You mad?

First of all, no one would want to go to chelsea because they arent in the champions league and haven't you seen abramovic tightening hiis purse :confused:

spurs on the other hand will continue to spend on players like adebayor and parker.

Bayern to beat Chelsea

Spurs to play Udinese in the qualifier and lose

Only London club in Europe next season.

SamDaGooner wrote:

Captain wrote:

Spurs will keep spending and Chelsea won't? You mad?

First of all, no one would want to go to chelsea because they arent in the champions league and haven't you seen abramovic tightening hiis purse :confused:

spurs on the other hand will continue to spend on players like adebayor and parker.

Chelsea have money and they're in the Champions League final. They also won the league two years ago, as opposed to Spurs who last won it before colour TV had been invented and Winston Churchill began his second term.

Just think of Spurs holding out hope of playing in Europe all until August.

Qualifier comes.

Bam!

Out of Europe and you can bet your bottom dollar if they lose that qualifier then Bale and others will be right out of the door, in late August not allowing Spurs to buy any replacements.

SamDaGooner wrote:

First of all, no one would want to go to chelsea because they arent in the champions league and haven't you seen abramovic tightening hiis purse :confused:

Chelsea spent almost £150m odd in 2011. You are indeed confused.

Klaus wrote:

SamDaGooner wrote:

First of all, no one would want to go to chelsea because they arent in the champions league and haven't you seen abramovic tightening hiis purse :confused:

spurs on the other hand will continue to spend on players like adebayor and parker.

Chelsea have money and they're in the Champions League final. They also won the league two years ago, as opposed to Spurs who last won it before colour TV had been invented and Winston Churchill began his second term.

Whats your point? im saying that i would prefer chelsea to lose the final. spuds have lost out on the cl before and yet they still spend big, this isnt make or break for them as they are always losing, but it is for chelsea because if they lose that final they wont be in the cl and i cant see many players wanted to go there. Also chelsea are based completely on financial strengh and with FFP and city taking over as the richest chelsea are like a small version of city having to rely on pensioners like lampard and drogba.