True, I was wrong on Stokes in saying we needed a batsman at 6. From what I've seen of him in the ODIs (admittedly I don't get any coverage of county cricket here), I didn't think he was up to it so happy to be proved wrong. Ian Chappell in the commentary keeps saying if you're in the side as an all rounder you need to either be good enough to bat in the top 6 just as a genuine batsman or good enough to be one of the 4 frontline bowlers. No point having someone who is not quite good enough at either, like Chris Woakes I guess. I had the impression Stokes was more a bowling all rounder so had concerns about him batting so high up but I guess I got that completely around the wrong way! Liked his attitude in not being afraid to dish out a few words in response to them and not being phased by any of what they gave him. Seemed to enjoy it. Wonder what odds you could have got on Stokes being England's first century maker before the series!
And to think Johnson probably wouldn't have played if all those other guys hadn't got injured!