Now that we're good again, watch how we'll suddenly get good fees for our players. And people will talk about Edu improving in this regard, when it's just that we have better surplus players to sell and are selling from a position of strength.

it's the right time for xhaka to go. he's coming off his best season for arsenal and leaves on good terms. we're levelling up as a club and he always had a bit of a ceiling as to what he could deliver in that LCM role.

I'm actually a bit excited now. the midfield revamp that's been overdue for about 10 years might actually be afoot

    daredevil what makes you think we'll set up in the same way when Xhaka leaves? Maybe I'm misunderstanding but I'm really confused by the notion that we need to get like-for-like replacements when Xhaka was clearly a compromise in how we set our midfield up this season.

    My expectation is that by replacing Xhaka our midfielders will be transition to being two-way players, meaning the need for creative output from his replacement won't be as great (and to be honest, if I remember the assists he provided were more about team structures rather than defence splitting passes, so I wouldn't be concerned that another person could come in and do the same as needed).

        Gazza M it’s strange how we always seem to have one or two positions which are lacking or where we could instantly improve the eleven

        Last time I felt we had a complete first team was the invincibles. Since then we’ve either needed a goalkeeper, a commanding centreback, balanced fullbacks, a defensive midfielder, or a striker who can take the game by the scruff of the neck

            Don Pacifico what makes you think we'll set up in the same way when Xhaka leaves? Maybe I'm misunderstanding but I'm really confused by the notion that we need to get like-for-like replacements when Xhaka was clearly a compromise in how we set our midfield up this season.

            I don’t think that’s an accurate reading at all. The system wasn’t the compromise, it was Xhaka. Don’t take it from me, here’s Arteta talking about it:

            “The squad wanted to evolve to another level and be more dominant and have more resources in the final third to attack and to score more goals. We needed to make that change.

            “I spoke to him at the end of the season and said, ‘I need to unlock something in your brain because you’re so comfortable and confident playing in this area that you have forgot that actually what is going to win us the game is here and the team now demands somebody here, so unless you unlock that I’m going to have to do something about it’.

            Xhaka was just a stop gap to bigger things. Arteta has also talked about playing Vieira and ESR there several times and actually played them too. It’s clear that he wants to turn that left 8 role into something productive.

            That being said, I think the merits of having someone like Rice doing it are there too. Win the ball high, drive with the ball and commit players, good in tight spaces, technical and athletic. It will make us more dynamic than your typical creative 8.

                goon for what it's worth, I think we're basically saying the same thing in so much as we're replacing Xhaka like-for-like (and Arteta's quote you referenced was exactly the one I had in mind). Where we potentially diverge is that I think part of the reason Partey plays the role he does is partly to cover Xhaka's deficiencies.

                Therefore, my expectation is that when we replace Xhaka, both his and Partey's roles will evolve somewhat versus what they were this season. But the emphasis will be the same in terms of facilitating more attacking play.

                • goon replied to this.

                    Would have actually kept him for his final year as a solid reliable squad option and sold Partey (for obvious reasons).

                    Hope this means we are signing both Rice and Caicedo. Partey can sit his arse on the bench next season.

                    Don Pacifico

                    Fair enough. I personally don’t think the system or Parteys roll will change much at all, but it will be interesting to see how it all pans out.

                    For sure Xhaka would have been somewhat of a restraint on how far we could push things.

                      I think Caicedo is being eyed for a right sided Zinchenko role, which would allow White to play centreback and give us depth there.

                      I know reports say we want both Rice ans Caicedo, plus a CB, RB and a winger, but that’s just too many players to bring in.

                      Should we get Rice and Caicedo, I’d expect us to only get one more player in. Probably a winger

                        goon

                        I'll be happy to see him go. Now's the time.

                        The fee is okay. It's good there is a fee. We could also have had €20m a couple of years ago when the Roma deal was on, but if we'd replaced him then it would've been with a lesser calibre of player.

                        And yes, he's done pretty well this season—and for a fair bit of last season—and registered some great moments. Really enjoyed when he got our third against Palace for example. Both Xhaka and Arteta deserve credit for all that.

                        But I do hold Xhaka a little bit responsible for setting off the capitulation at Anfield that then led to our overall surrender. Call it paranoia or an agenda, but I think his temper's let us down too many times. We will be a notch stabler without him and the airspace in the dressing room might allow some of the younger ones to step up.

                          Tierney + Balogan + Xhaka ideally should get us 100 mill E IMO

                            Cannon Sounds about right. Tierney and Balogun should both cost 40+m.

                            Xhaka we know his price is 15m euros

                              I refuse to think that we're getting 40m for any of those two. Would happily sell for that though.

                                reckon we can get 40m for Tierney from an English club. balogun I reckon will be 25-30m tops

                                QuincyAbeyie We bought Tierney for 25m, Newcastle bought Matt Targett for similar amount.

                                Surely we can fleece them. They already paid 22m for Willock

                                  We shouldn't be selling Tierney to a direct rival for anything less than £40m.

                                  If Tierney wants to go to Aston Villa or something at that level we can go for a £25m deal.

                                  I'd be very surprised if Edu suddenly starts getting maximum value from players like Balogun and Tierney.