Other Clubs Transfers Gossip 2023: Page 252 - The Arsenal discussion forum and community: One more in the Tolly

Other Clubs Transfers Gossip 2023

lorddulaarsenal

Big downgrade from their midfield last season.

lorddulaarsenal

daredevil their attack will have poor runs of form too. Streaky players

Claudius

Midfield will be lost against Arsenal, PSG and Barca but should handle most midfields.

Bruno will also hopefully help us match up better against PSG. He, Odegaard and Rice will have good balance of passing and driving. And the can close out with merino, MLS and Zubi.

TambourineMan

Am surprised that under the SCR regime, Chelsea (and City for that matter) didn't seem to hold back on some of their 'stock' for future seasons. It'll reset next summer and they'll be in trouble unless they can then find more sales.

I do prefer SCR over PSR for this reason.

Bernard Woolley

Depends on which SCR regime you are referring to. The PL one explicitly provides a 30% roll-over that can be utilized across years and averaged. The UEFA SCR regime also averages out in its own way since UEFA has said they will measure the breaches committed "over a period of 4 years" so it's not quite as black and white as that in my view.

TambourineMan

Bernard Woolley

true, but their SCR won't drop under 85% so the max benefit they can carry forward remains 30% regardless of the fact that they raked it in this year. for example, if we hit 85% on the dot and they are at like 50%, we both start next season with 30%.

under PSR, their profits from this year would have been carried forward more meaningfully. put a different way, assume we make nil profits and Chelsea make £100m, then over the next two seasons we can then make a max loss of £115m but Chelsea would be able to make £215m in losses over the same period.

it feels like SCR removes the advantage they would have received under PSR.

Bernard Woolley

Is it not the same (apart from the 30% cap vs unlimited roll-over in PSR)? For instance, if they are at 50% and we are 85% in Y1, they can be at 115% in Y2 with no further obligation whereas if we hit 115% in Y2, we have an obligation to be at 55% in Y3. So the only difference I see is that the carry-forward / lookback is 30% per year vs infinite in PSR (since it aggregated 3 years)?

TambourineMan

Bernard Woolley I could be wrong but I don't think that is how it works, if they are at 50% and us 85% in Y1, both have 30% to play with in Y2. If we're both then at 115% in Y2, we both need to be back at 85% in Y3 to not breach.

The 30% they saved vs us in Y1 is of no use to them in Y2 and Y3 if we're both compliant (i.e. both under 85%).

Bring Back Kerrea Gilbert

Qwiss A big injury to Haaland

Unless someone spills tea on his motherboard, he'll be fine I reckon.

« Previous Page