I wasn't going to bother engaging on this topic seriously, but that's an over simplistic summary that doesn't really address where the difference of opinion lie.
I think it was pretty widely accepted, certainly in my case, that we should have performed better than we had. At the same most of you guys would accept this squad needed overhaul. The difference of opinion lie in whether the latter point mitigated the former. Either way the accusations of negativity don't come from that particular debate or anyone disagreeing in good faith.
It's comes from the barrage of sarcy responses you got whenever anyone dared to suggest there might be positive signs or trends, or offered up reasons for poor form etc. I have no issues with someone taking the piss (as you regularly do Jones) but I have to admit I rolled my eyes and logged out when every other post on here was a passive aggressive 'trust the process lolz' or 'toxic positivity' or 'lolz since yesterday we've won all our games lmao'. This is what Don is referring to when he says you think twice about brothering to post anything remotely positive and why this place came across as overwhelmingly negative even though most of us were in a negative midset ourselves as you pointed out earlier.