Lol. WBA are jokers.
Chelsea very lucky with horrible goalkeeping. Looked like WBA were fielding Kepa.
Coombs wrote: Eh, that's not a handball.
Eh, that's not a handball.
100% hit his hand, see the replay from the side.
Did the rules change or something? Accidental handballs always rules out any goals last season
Clrnc wrote: Coombs wrote: Eh, that's not a handball. 100% hit his hand, see the replay from the side. Did the rules change or something? Accidental handballs always rules out any goals last season
Rules changed in the summer, mate. They now say that if there is a handball and then there is some dribbling or passing, the handball doesn’t count. We all need an online course to decipher this shit
I think us, Chelsea and United all very similar in being pretty poor at the back having some decent quality up front as well. Just a question of who will be more consistent
Lampard a shit managers. He's gonna crumble under the pressure this season.
Just seen the results. Of course United got a penalty in the 100th minute.
After the final whistle was blown...
awooga83 wrote: I think us, Chelsea and United all very similar in being pretty poor at the back having some decent quality up front as well. Just a question of who will be more consistent
I think we're much better at the back than Chelsea and Man U. We have similar problems going forward though.
Why are Chelsea chasing Rice? Lampard wasted all his money on everything but young centre backs. He needs to stop buying and start coaching.
Rice in Jorginho out is not an upgrade.
He didn’t even need Ziyech. He spent too much up front. He’s got so many forwards and attacking mids already.
Qwiss! wrote: Rice in Jorginho out is not an upgrade.
God I hope Chelsea are dumb enough to kneecap themselves like that. Jorginho has his issues but he's twice the player Rice is. Chelsea's fluidity problem feels connected to them not having more passers on Jorginho's level more than anything. It's all a bit slow and non-technical in there, although Havertz is going to be an incredible level up in that sense.
Kel Varnsen wrote: awooga83 wrote: I think us, Chelsea and United all very similar in being pretty poor at the back having some decent quality up front as well. Just a question of who will be more consistent I think we're much better at the back than Chelsea and Man U. We have similar problems going forward though.
I certainly wouldn't argue that Chelsea or United have a better defence then us. I'm not sure how much better wet may be though. On the flip side Chelsea probably have a better offensive side.
You guys told me Bamford was shit
Sheffield United have lost 3 from 3 and face us next. Not sure how to feel about that.
Feel good. You should feel good.
Mirth wrote: You guys told me Bamford was shit
Great for my FPL points.
Who was it who kept saying Bamford is shit here? I remember every week when Nketiah is on loan a few will be angry at Bamford starting 😆
Clrnc wrote: Mirth wrote: You guys told me Bamford was shit Great for my FPL points. Who was it who kept saying Bamford is shit here? I remember every week when Nketiah is on loan a few will be angry at Bamford starting 😆
It was Klaus. He was breaking tables and vases. Bamford is decent. The one nice thing about him as a striker is he can score with every movable part of his body.
How many assists will Kane get this season? Fek!
Newcastle are awful. I was just thinking how well coached some of these smaller sides seem to be, defo not the case here. They look like they have no idea what to do.
