mdgoonah41 wrote:
i mean, if we are getting him on loan and paying a modest loan fee, this seems fine. i wont overreact until we know the particulars
I mean the suggestion when we were first linked was they'd wan't something approaching a years worth of the fee they're paying Liverpool, which I think was £25m...
I assume that would be bullshit, but even a 10m loan fee plus what I assume would be substantial wages would cost us in excess of 20m.
Hopefully it is nonsense. This is more of a 'Woodward' rather than 'outsmarting the market'.