So you hate them because they are rich?

It's definitely one of the reasons.

Newcastle.. lol.. penalty in the last min of extra time and they couldnt bury it to win after being down to 10 men.. lol..

Kenedy was always going to fuck that penalty up.

Hayden picked up a red card, stupid tackle.

Newcastle 0 - 0 Cardiff

Newcastle deserve it for being so wasteful and shit last week.

flobaba wrote:

So you hate them because they are rich?

Do you love them?

On top of everything else, im sure cheating is involved too. Quite a few dodgy linesman decisions last season in their favor.

flobaba wrote:

So you hate them because they are rich?

Their source of wealth is effectively a state run enterprise.

The best thing about Manchester City from a sporting perspective is that they stop Liverpool, United, Spurs and Chelsea from winning the title. But on a more fundamental level, they're pretty hard to like.

est wrote:

flobaba wrote:

So you hate them because they are rich?

Do you love them?

No, I don’t love them. But I also don’t hate them or sneer at them, like if my club happened to find itself with owners with the ability to drop wad like the Arabs do, like I wouldn’t enjoy it.

Mirth wrote:

flobaba wrote:

So you hate them because they are rich?

Their source of wealth is effectively a state run enterprise.

Does it really matter what the source of their wealth is, like really?

Mirth wrote:

flobaba wrote:

So you hate them because they are rich?

Their source of wealth is effectively a state run enterprise.

The best thing about Manchester City from a sporting perspective is that they stop Liverpool, United, Spurs and Chelsea from winning the title. But on a more fundamental level, they're pretty hard to like.

flobs is just doing his thing again. It's pointless to put any effort into the responses.

oh dear me Chambers.. almost handed a goal to Spuds

Chambers doing his best Mustafi impression.

Clangers with a hospital pass

Dumbo

flobaba wrote:

Mirth wrote:

Their source of wealth is effectively a state run enterprise.

Does it really matter what the source of their wealth is, like really?

Funny, this wasn't the tone you took when Arsenal signed a sponsorship deal with Visit Rwanda. And that was just for a couple of logos.

Chambers had a mare last weekend too.

flobaba wrote:

est wrote:

Do you love them?

No, I don’t love them. But I also don’t hate them or sneer at them, like if my club happened to find itself with owners with the ability to drop wad like the Arabs do, like I wouldn’t enjoy it.

It's not your club that's in that position though. Do you think we as Arsenal fans should enjoy what City are doing? If not, why wouldn't we mock them and their cocky manager who had the audacity to whine about not having enough great players, when they've got probably the deepest and one of the greatest squads ever in PL history?

walcott on the score board for everton

est wrote:

flobaba wrote:

No, I don’t love them. But I also don’t hate them or sneer at them, like if my club happened to find itself with owners with the ability to drop wad like the Arabs do, like I wouldn’t enjoy it.

It's not your club that's in that position though. Do you think we as Arsenal fans should enjoy what City are doing? If not, why wouldn't we mock them and their cocky manager who had the audacity to whine about not having enough great players, when they've got probably the deepest and one of the greatest squads ever in PL history?

I can respect your argument.

Richarlison scores again!

Tottenham score . Lucas Moura. Neat finish from edge of the box

Brazilian Andros Townsend.

Mirth wrote:

flobaba wrote:

Does it really matter what the source of their wealth is, like really?

Funny, this wasn't the tone you took when Arsenal signed a sponsorship deal with Visit Rwanda. And that was just for a couple of logos.

We are talking here about at the ownership level. Is it a Abrahamovic, the Arabs, the Glazers, the Kroenke’s, etc. We don’t live in a glass house so why throw those stones.

Walcott still has that (“under rated around here”) end product

Come on Mitrovic!

Mitrovic scores with a header while sitting on his arse! Great stuff.

flobaba wrote:

Mirth wrote:

Funny, this wasn't the tone you took when Arsenal signed a sponsorship deal with Visit Rwanda. And that was just for a couple of logos.

We are talking here about at the ownership level. Is it a Abrahamovic, the Arabs, the Glazers, the Kroenke’s, etc. We don’t live in a glass house so why throw those stones.

Both Manchester City and PSG are a projection of state driven agendas internationally and an attempt to portray soft power. Similar to the Visit Rwanda deal.

Kroenke is also a shit head anyway- it's not like Arsenal fans like him either.

ugh.. trippier free kick goal.. damn.. was hoping fulham could hold for a draw

That Trippier has a free kick on him eh

fuckin hell.. kane buries it for 3-1 and the game is done now

flobaba wrote:

That Trippier has a free kick on him eh

and yet...  only his second goal for the spuds

Harry Kane has a league goal in August!

How was that even a thing?

flobaba wrote:

Harry Kane has a league goal in August!

How was that even a thing?

He was being defended by Calum Chambers.

Chambers been awful again. Remind me, who were all those that moaned when we put him out on loan?

Sicario wrote:

Chambers been awful again. Remind me, who were all those that moaned when we put him out on loan?

Sicario wrote:

DT claims Chambers will go to Fulham on loan. Weird one, Chambers had a good last third to the season.