jones wrote:
y va marquer wrote:
mags there's an opinion on here that vehemently and aggressively demands that we believe that mainstream media, intelligence organisations, official investigative authorities, police, people who hold positions of power in any democratic state (western if you like) are never, ever credible sources.
If you are seen as someone who holds an opinion other than that, be prepared for excessively dismissive and condescending comments.
It's not a reflection on you or your opinion at all.
You have some cheek to complain y va, you're complaining about people being excessively condescending and sound like Marie fucking Antoinette doing it š
It's never been about holding any type of opinion. There are concrete facts put out by agencies that anyone willing can verify or dismiss using publicly available data and information. It's fine if you couldn't be bothered to do so but then you're not in any position to judge or criticise opinions who spent the time and energy examining whatever said institutions are trying to feed us. It's insane really that I have to explain this to an adult.
Where am I complaining?
Or judging or Ā criticizing?
It's possible not to discredit everything that is broadcast on mainstream Ā media whilst at the same time not accepting it as gospel.
I remember the discussion well, it involved being harangued and buried under waves of posts that supported your view, but didn't actually concretely prove anything.
