Won't happen in January.

Think he's average.

He's not good enough for them, so how is he good enough for us?

Probably because we are not the unarguably best team in the world.

He's not capable of improving us. Surely the aim is to be the best team in the world?

He would improve us because he is better than all our current options.
And if you think "he's not good enough for them, how is he good enough for us?", does that mean players like Szczesny, Gibbs, Sagna, Arteta, Cazorla, Walcott, Podolski and Wilshere are not good enough for us? Because neither of them would start at Bayern. Or does it only apply to Mandzukic?

sabret00the wrote:

He's not good enough for them, so how is he good enough for us?

He just spearheaded their best ever season and now he isn't good enough..? That's ridiculous.

He's more than good enough for Arsenal and Bayern.

I think Guardiola will keep playing Mandzukic over Lewandowski next season.

Don't like the sound of this league he's playing in. Do you have to be a psycopathic woman hater to get a game? Kel?

He's what Giroud should be but since wenger won't sell giroud it's pointless bringing in a similar albeit superior player

Timothy wrote:

Don't like the sound of this league he's playing in. Do you have to be a psycopathic woman hater to get a game? Kel?

Title made me think it was a Mario games bundle thread.
Not the most exciting but cannot ignore his stats and he is, unquestionably, better than Bendtner.
Just do not think he is a Wenger-type (i should kick myself for using that!) player but neither was Gervinho.

sabret00the wrote:

He's not good enough for them, so how is he good enough for us?

City must be glad they didn't use this logic when they went for yaya.

number_0 wrote:

sabret00the wrote:

He's not good enough for them, so how is he good enough for us?

City must be glad they didn't use this logic when they went for yaya.

I personally only rate Yaya over Rosicky and Flamini, so it's a moot point.

That point is totally moot

Is sabre double-zero tiger saying number zero's point is debatable and open for discussion but may not come to any satisfactory conclusion or simply that the conclusion may be meaningless?
A:yes
B:no
C:maybe
D:huh?