deardevil wrote: Claudius wrote: Wow. That's an incredibly meticulous loan approval process. The new Arsenal is a massive upgrade on Gazidis' corner store. Why do you assume this is new? We've never had this level of behind the scenes exposure at any point in football history.
Claudius wrote: Wow. That's an incredibly meticulous loan approval process. The new Arsenal is a massive upgrade on Gazidis' corner store.
Wow. That's an incredibly meticulous loan approval process. The new Arsenal is a massive upgrade on Gazidis' corner store.
Why do you assume this is new? We've never had this level of behind the scenes exposure at any point in football history.
Because the article says so
😆
good article, the type of content i may consider paying for.
i like the idea of financial penalties if the loanee doesn't play enough games. ensures clubs don't let these guys sit on their bench to make up the numbers
Looks like the club have realised that it's been yet another area where we've under performed for too long, with the Gnabry scenario possibly being the final straw.
i like penalizing the clubs for not playing the loanee. i'd make it so they don't have to pay anything if they played them in enough games.
Meatwad wrote: i like penalizing  the clubs for not playing the loanee. i'd make it so they don't have to pay anything if they played them in enough games.
i like penalizing  the clubs for not playing the loanee. i'd make it so they don't have to pay anything if they played them in enough games.
I know some players who's contract has them getting paid more if they're fit and not used.Â
speedy wrote: Meatwad wrote: i like penalizing  the clubs for not playing the loanee. i'd make it so they don't have to pay anything if they played them in enough games. I know some players who's contract has them getting paid more if they're fit and not used.Â
That makes far more sense than the deals we usually hear about, where the club loaning the player pay more if the player makes x number of appearances or minutes = it's counter productive to either player development or encouraging the borrowing club to have any interest to making an offer to purchase the player.
https://www.goal.com/en/amp/news/from-pepe-tierney-to-nelson-willock-inside-arsenals-creation/1oc8eo9h2c1gr12frhjq1yscqk?__twitter_impression=true
@lorddulaarsenal wrote: https://www.goal.com/en/amp/news/from-pepe-tierney-to-nelson-willock-inside-arsenals-creation/1oc8eo9h2c1gr12frhjq1yscqk?__twitter_impression=true
A brief history of Arsenal
Claudius wrote: @lorddulaarsenal wrote: https://www.goal.com/en/amp/news/from-pepe-tierney-to-nelson-willock-inside-arsenals-creation/1oc8eo9h2c1gr12frhjq1yscqk?__twitter_impression=true A brief history of Arsenal
charles watts definitely has a subscription to the athletic
Do some of you guys work for the athletic? The amount of times I’ve read it on here the past few times has been unusual.
Ray wrote: Do some of you guys work for the athletic? The amount of times I’ve read it on here the past few times has been unusual.
No, but just about every decent journalist who doesn’t have his own company does. They’re hovering them up
Speaking about journalists anyone hear about Paolo Baldini aka Nicky?
Incredibly brave of her to come out.
[Twitter]
Such good technique on this kid. Keep seeing oustanding things from him.
generated great power on that strike with very little backlift.
Azeez looks quality.
Perfect physique
Extended clip is better, shows some clever buildup play from him too:
What's his best role currently?
