Biggus wrote: Depressed Rex wrote: I'd take reviewing post match as a start. They should look at diving, dubious tackles and poor sportsmanship as headbutting, elbowing, spitting and the like. Then a panel of independants should decide on consequences. Next stage should of course be another person in the reffing team in front of tv images to aid the head ref. Remove those pointless penalty box refs. And the stage after that? Dispense with the ref altogether as we can see everything we want from the 100's of cameras everywhere.
Depressed Rex wrote: I'd take reviewing post match as a start. They should look at diving, dubious tackles and poor sportsmanship as headbutting, elbowing, spitting and the like. Then a panel of independants should decide on consequences. Next stage should of course be another person in the reffing team in front of tv images to aid the head ref. Remove those pointless penalty box refs.
I'd take reviewing post match as a start. They should look at diving, dubious tackles and poor sportsmanship as headbutting, elbowing, spitting and the like. Then a panel of independants should decide on consequences. Next stage should of course be another person in the reffing team in front of tv images to aid the head ref. Remove those pointless penalty box refs.
And the stage after that? Dispense with the ref altogether as we can see everything we want from the 100's of cameras everywhere.
Text voting on decisions. The Ref-Factor.
Yeah we live in a age where there are cameras everywhere and everyone has a opinion, thats fine but the reason the law must lag behind public opinion is to stop crazy fads becoming law. If theres still a problem with diving in 20 years time we can look at the issue again.
Biggus wrote: Depressed Rex wrote: I'd take reviewing post match as a start. They should look at diving, dubious tackles and poor sportsmanship as headbutting, elbowing, spitting and the like. Then a panel of independants should decide on consequences. Next stage should of course be another person in the reffing team in front of tv images to aid the head ref. Remove those pointless penalty box refs. And the stage after that? Dispense with the ref altogether as we can see everything we want from the 100's of cameras everywhere. Thin-end-of-wedge.
Thin-end-of-wedge.
There is no stage after that. Gus, you do know that once upon a time there was only the 1 ref, right? Then they added linos. Then they added penalty box refs. Things DO change you know! And yet - the game itself lives on. Mindblowing.
Fucking linesmen. They're destroying the sport. And what's this I hear about an offside rule?!
Substitutions are for pussies.
The offside rule really killed the game didn't it? 🙁 We shouldn't even be calling it football after that. At least not football any more after they got rid of the pass back to the goalie!
Don't be stupid and disingenuous, some rule changes have been beneficial and others like the constant tinkering with the offside law have been confusing. I'm a big fan of keeping the rules and ethos surrounding the game simple thats why it's the most popular game in the world, too many rules and control by technology will destroy it's accessibility especially among poorer nations.
You don't know that. I think you are wrong btw...
Biggus, your stance on this matter is completely and totally ridiculous.
We don't need new rules, just better ways of enforcing the current rules.
We definitely don't need more or longer stoppages though.
Coombs wrote: Biggus, your stance on this matter is completely and totally ridiculous.
Why? because I don't want any new stupid rule changes that would depend on a technological solution to problems that wouldn't exist if the existing rules were enforced properly?
Biggus wrote: 他妈的这一块狗屎！
他妈的这一块狗屎！
Google translate has it as "Fuck a dog feces" 😆. I guess that would appear in the manual ! I'm on the "don't like it and want eradicated from the game" bandwagon... post-game review sounds better to me than in-game technology. Though I still remember the Battiston-Schumacher incident from when I was a kid... A video referee then would have been good !
😆 Thats what the electronic thingy operator would say.
1982 WC semi final remember it well. But the referee must have had a clear view he was straight through on goal, the ball was there (I think).........
Well, 去他妈的瞎裁判没有得到一个正确的 then.
😆 you guys
Biggus wrote: 1982 WC semi final remember it well. But the referee must have had a clear view he was straight through on goal, the ball was there (I think).........
I've just had a quick look at it ( the ball had been there... Imagine Hart or De Gea pulling this off against Wilshere and the ref not even giving a foul !
nahoum wrote: Well, 去他妈的瞎裁判没有得到一个正确的 then.
😆
