Tony Montana wrote:Top brass player.
And so much for him getting injured so easily and so regularly.
Are you trying to get a reaction here? We all seen the first time you said how great he was, get over it.
Tony Montana wrote:Top brass player.
And so much for him getting injured so easily and so regularly.
Are you trying to get a reaction here? We all seen the first time you said how great he was, get over it.
ludovic van zis wrote:Van Persie's desire to play for utd is perverse. When he talked about the little boy inside him I believe he meant it.
So?
He was never a gooner like us. Don't bother bringing up that photo of him in a Arsenal shirt when he was 12 or whatever. He clearly stated he supported Barcelona as well during that time.
qs! wrote:Tony Montana wrote:Top brass player.
And so much for him getting injured so easily and so regularly.
Are you trying to get a reaction here? We all seen the first time you said how great he was, get over it.
Wanted to highlight the bold part too.
Most of his injuries came from rough tackles, he's avoided those for a while now. He'll probably benefit from the extra protection Man Utd players get.
y va marquer wrote:Tony Montana wrote:This is what I hate about this foreigner diving rubbish.
Yep the likes of Young, Gerrard, Owen in his day are all fairly elite level divers.
And when Owen dived against Argentina in the 2002 WC, the english commentator said, 'well when you leave your foot out like that then what do you expect?'
The game ended 1-0 to England via a David Beckham peno from Owen's dive.
Nah Tony, it's not that. I've no problem with players being professionals and not really caring about rivalries. Hell, that's how we got Sol. But if you believe Wenger the guy had a better offer from the champs and refused it just to play for ferguson. I don't know, I just find that perverse. He's a twat.
Fuck Robin Van Persie!!!
Don't really enjoy watching strikers who can't carry the ball ala Ronaldo(Brazilian), Henry, Weah etc, well except if they are banging them in for my team.
Gutted for Shakhtar but I still think they'll end up topping the group. Chelsea go out if they lose to Juve and Shakhtar win against Nordsjaelland, right? That would be great!
Great goal from Giovinco tonight.
I liked VP when he played for us and i now hate him as he plays for manure. No explanation required. It is the law!
ludovic van zis wrote:Nah Tony, it's not that. I've no problem with players being professionals and not really caring about rivalries. Hell, that's how we got Sol. But if you believe Wenger the guy had a better offer from the champs and refused it just to play for ferguson. I don't know, I just find that perverse. He's a twat.
Why's that perverse? People come here to play for Wenger. Fabregas did for a start.
It just shows RVP didn't move just for the money. United's structure is much better than City's even now.
Bold Tone wrote:I liked VP when he played for us and i now hate him as he plays for manure. No explanation required. It is the law!
Logical thinking.
Mine is illogical hence why I apologised, but I really like his game.
Vantastic wrote:Gutted for Shakhtar but I still think they'll end up topping the group. Chelsea go out if they lose to Juve and Shakhtar win against Nordsjaelland, right? That would be great!
Would depend on the Shaktar-Juve result in the last match. Shaktar has the tie-break won vs Chelsea if both are tied as a result of away goal in their two matches together. If Juve beats Chelsea, Chelsea would also lose that tiebreak.
Chelsea could however still get though if Shaktar beats Juve in the last game and they beat the Swedish side (10pts vs 9)
FEBravo wrote:Vantastic wrote:Gutted for Shakhtar but I still think they'll end up topping the group. Chelsea go out if they lose to Juve and Shakhtar win against Nordsjaelland, right? That would be great!
Would depend on the Shaktar-Juve result in the last match. Shaktar has the tie-break won vs Chelsea if both are tied as a result of away goal in their two matches together. If Juve beats Chelsea, Chelsea would also lose that tiebreak.
Chelsea could however still get though if Shaktar beats Juve in the last game and they beat the Swedish side (10pts vs 9)
Yeah the above is spot on. Thought for a moment all 3 teams were on 7 points.
I just can't take it. Every game. Every fucking game Van Persie gets a crucial goal.
Anyway, Celtic, well done to them.
OptaJoe wrote:16% - Celtic's 16.4% possession tonight is the lowest figure ever recorded by Opta by a winning team in the Champions League. Grab.
edit: sky have it even worse (or funnier):
ooooouch
edit: the ouch was meant for Barca.
illusory domination â„¢
They didn't fancy it on a cold night oop norf...
qs! wrote:Tony Montana wrote:You say that every season though.
They don't have the sort of players Clrnc likes, thats all. Their attacking talent is incredible. A guy like Wellbeck would be 1st choice here, there he's fighting RVP and Rooney for game time.
They were the inferior team all 4 matches this UCL. Nobody can say they are not lucky and deserved it totally in all 4.
Tony Montana wrote:He was never a gooner like us. Don't bother bringing up that photo of him in a Arsenal shirt when he was 12 or whatever. He clearly stated he supported Barcelona as well during that time.
TBH Tony theres a few around here that would be like that too.
Patters wrote:I just can't take it. Every game. Every fucking game Van Persie gets a crucial goal.
Anyway, Celtic, well done to them.
OptaJoe wrote:16% - Celtic's 16.4% possession tonight is the lowest figure ever recorded by Opta by a winning team in the Champions League. Grab.
edit: sky have it even worse (or funnier):
Yes Patters, but those statistics are in the wrong order.
All the irrelevant crap should come first to build up to the bottom line- the only stat that matters.
Bloody hell. Unbelievable feet by Iniesta