Flobsy, I think it's fair to compare it to Hunger games. They're both fiction with lots of action. The problem with Hunger, as I said, is that because it is written from the first person perspective of a child, it really fails to immerse you in the world. I have the other two books which I am sure start to fill in the gaps, but can't be bothered to read them now that I've moved onto Christie's "Murder on The Orient Express" and Obama's "Audacity of Hope". In fact, Hunger games has an advantage in that the author has a completely blank canvas that she can fill with detail in terms of the world the story takes place in. I never really felt like I was there, and after a while it was just like reading a description of the TV show 'Survivor' with some murder and genetically engineered wasps.
I love it when an author really immerses you. An example of a fiction in a fantastical context that manages this is one of my favorite books "Winter's Tale" by Mark Helprin. Read it. You'll be mesmerized.